Dec. 21, 2012 ? If the sinful excess of holiday eating sends your system into butter-slathered, brandy-soaked overload, you are not alone: People who are jet-lagged, people who work graveyard shifts and plain-old late-night snackers know just how you feel.
All these activities upset the body's "food clock," a collection of interacting genes and molecules known technically as the food-entrainable oscillator, which keeps the human body on a metabolic even keel. A new study by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) is helping to reveal how this clock works on a molecular level.
Published this month in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the UCSF team has shown that a protein called PKC? is critical in resetting the food clock if our eating habits change.
The study showed that normal laboratory mice given food only during their regular sleeping hours will adjust their food clock over time and begin to wake up from their slumber, and run around in anticipation of their new mealtime. But mice lacking the PKC? gene are not able to respond to changes in their meal time -- instead sleeping right through it.
The work has implications for understanding the molecular basis of diabetes, obesity and other metabolic syndromes because a desynchronized food clock may serve as part of the pathology underlying these disorders, said Louis Ptacek, MD, the John C. Coleman Distinguished Professor of Neurology at UCSF and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator.
It may also help explain why night owls are more likely to be obese than morning larks, Ptacek said.
"Understanding the molecular mechanism of how eating at the "wrong" time of the day desynchronizes the clocks in our body can facilitate the development of better treatments for disorders associated with night-eating syndrome, shift work and jet lag," he added.
Resetting the Food Clock
Look behind the face of a mechanical clock and you will see a dizzying array of cogs, flywheels, reciprocating counterbalances and other moving parts. Biological clocks are equally complex, composed of multiple interacting genes that turn on or off in an orchestrated way to keep time during the day.
In most organisms, biological clockworks are governed by a master clock, referred to as the "circadian oscillator," which keeps track of time and coordinates our biological processes with the rhythm of a 24-hour cycle of day and night.
Life forms as diverse as humans, mice and mustard greens all possess such master clocks. And in the last decade or so, scientists have uncovered many of their inner workings, uncovering many of the genes whose cycles are tied to the clock and discovering how in mammals it is controlled by a tiny spot in the brain known as the "superchiasmatic nucleus."
Scientists also know that in addition to the master clock, our bodies have other clocks operating in parallel throughout the day. One of these is the food clock, which is not tied to one specific spot in the brain but rather multiple sites throughout the body.
The food clock is there to help our bodies make the most of our nutritional intake. It controls genes that help in everything from the absorption of nutrients in our digestive tract to their dispersal through the bloodstream, and it is designed to anticipate our eating patterns. Even before we eat a meal, our bodies begin to turn on some of these genes and turn off others, preparing for the burst of sustenance -- which is why we feel the pangs of hunger just as the lunch hour arrives.
Scientist have known that the food clock can be reset over time if an organism changes its eating patterns, eating to excess or at odd times, since the timing of the food clock is pegged to feeding during the prime foraging and hunting hours in the day. But until now, very little was known about how the food clock works on a genetic level.
What Ptacek and his colleagues discovered is the molecular basis for this phenomenon: the PKC? protein binds to another molecule called BMAL and stabilizes it, which shifts the clock in time.
The article, "PKC? participates in food entrainment by regulating BMAL1" is authored by Luoying Zhang, Diya Abrahama, Shu-Ting Lin, Henrik Oster, Gregor Eichele, Ying-Hui Fu, and Louis J. Pt?cek and appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
In addition to UCSF, authors on the study are affiliated with the Max Planck Institute of Biophysical Chemistry in G?ttingen, Germany.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health via grants #GM079180 and #708 HL059596, the Sandler Neurogenetics Fund, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). The original article was written by Jason Bardi.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
Journal Reference:
- L. Zhang, D. Abraham, S.-T. Lin, H. Oster, G. Eichele, Y.-H. Fu, L. J. Ptacek. PKC? participates in food entrainment by regulating BMAL1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012; 109 (50): 20679 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218699110
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.
Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/~3/H0BRGMVgKxc/121224113351.htm
w.e. episodes idris elba kelsey grammer martin henderson mlk day golden globes 2012 winners
There was a moment on Sunday when I thought the PC gamers had been hiding something from me.
So, since then, I've tried playing games on my PC. I plugged the thing into my TV to even try Steam's Big Picture mode and more or less turn my gaming laptop into a glorified console. This would be my return to PC gaming via the shallow end of the pool. I'd play it safe by playing games in a manner I've played them so often before: on my TV, controller in my hands.
?No. 1 seed: Houston Texans (12-2)* ? vs. Vikings (8-6), at Colts (9-5)
No. 2 seed: Denver Broncos (11-3)* ? vs. Browns (5-9), vs. Chiefs (2-12)
No. 3 seed: New England Patriots (10-4)* ? at Jaguars (2-12), vs. Dolphins (6-8)
?No. 4 seed: Baltimore Ravens (9-5)* ?vs. Giants (8-6), at Bengals (8-6)
No. 5 seed: Indianapolis Colts (9-5) ? at Chiefs (2-12), vs. Texans (12-2)
No. 6 seed: Cincinnati Bengals (8-6) ? at Steelers (7-7), vs. Ravens (9-5)
Pittsburgh Steelers (7-7) ? vs. Bengals (8-6), vs. Browns (5-9)
No. 1 seed: Atlanta Falcons (12-2)* ? at Lions (4-10), vs. Buccaneers (6-8)
No. 2 seed: San Francisco 49ers (10-3-1)* ? at Seahawks (9-5), vs. Cardinals (5-9)
No. 3 seed: Green Bay Packers (10-4)* ? vs. Titans (4-9), at Vikings (8-6)
No. 4 seed: Washington Redskins (8-6) ? at Eagles (4-10), vs. Cowboys (8-6)
No. 5 seed: Seattle Seahawks (9-5) ? vs. 49ers (10-3-1), vs. Rams (6-7-1)
No. 6 seed: Minnesota Vikings (8-6) ? at Texans (12-2), vs. Packers (10-4)
Chicago Bears (8-6) ? at Cardinals (5-9), at Lions (4-10)
Dallas Cowboys (8-6) ? vs. Saints (6-8), at Redskins (8-6)
New York Giants (8-6) ? at Ravens (9-5), vs. Eagles (4-10)
